Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-216235

ABSTRACT

Globally, the prevalence of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) increases with age. In India, there is a rapidly growing burden of coronary artery disease (CAD), which has become the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Despite recommended medical therapy, patients with CCS are still at risk of ischemic events. Currently, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended in the form of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor or low dose rivaroxaban in patients with stable CAD and/or peripheral artery disease (PAD). A low dose of rivaroxaban in combination with aspirin is a promising approach; however, for patients who might benefit the most, it still remains a challenge. Clinical trial data on this new drug was certainly very encouraging, with evidence from the COMPASS trial and prespecified subgroups of COMPASS trials suggesting that the addition of rivaroxaban to aspirin was associated with a significantly lower risk of ischemic events, mortality, and tolerable bleeding profile in patients with CCS and high-risk factors. This combination is cost-effective and generally well tolerated in patients with CAD and/or PAD, as well as patients with CCS and multimorbidity or high-risk populations.

2.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-91622

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of 2.5 mg of S-Amlodipine with 5 mg of Amlodipine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension in a double blind, double dummy, randomized, comparative clinical trial. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Two hundred OPD patients (97 women and 103 men) with mean age 53.4 +/- 5.58 years, with stage I and stage 2 hypertension were enrolled for the study after obtaining informed written consent. Twelve patients were dropped out as lost to follow up. Ninety seven patients in the S-Amlodipine 2.5 mg treatment group and ninety one patients in the Amlodipine 5 mg treatment group completed the study. Those with a history of angina pectoris, myocardial infarction or recent cerebrovascular accident in the past six months and those with stage 3 and stage 4 hypertension were excluded from the study. Those showing a history of secondary hypertension were also excluded from the study. For the first two weeks all patients received dummy tablets of both S-Amlodipine and Amlodipine, as a wash out therapy and to get the actual blood pressure reading. After two weeks, enrolled patients received a preparation containing either S-Amlodipine (containing 2.5 mg of S-Amlodipine) and dummy tablets of Amlodipine or Amlodipine besylate (containing 5 mg of racemic Amlodipine) and dummy tablets of S-Amlodipine once daily for a period of six weeks. RESULTS: The results were analyzed by Student's 't' test The reduction in the average systolic and diastolic blood pressure, in the standing, supine and sitting postures in the S-Amlodipine group as well as in the Amlodipine group after six weeks of treatment was highly significant (P < or = 0.0001). The baseline values for average systolic blood pressure in standing, supine and sitting positions in the S-Amlodipine 2.5 mg treatment group were found to be 164.12 +/- 10.28, 165.72 +/- 10.88 and 165.24 +/- 10.66 mm of Hg respectively, which after treatment of six weeks changed to 144.9 +/- 7.4, 146.04 +/- 8.56 and 145.36 +/- 8.32 mm of Hg. The baseline values for average systolic blood pressure in standing, supine and sitting positions in the Amlodipine 5 mg treatment group were found to be 164.57 +/- 10.36, 166.47 +/- 10.58 and 165.81 +/- 10.54 mm of Hg respectively, which after treatment of six weeks changed to 154.42 +/- 6.33, 147.23 +/- 7.11 and 146.57 +/- 7.54 mm of Hg. The baseline values for average diastolic blood pressure in standing, supine and sitting positions in the S-Amlodipine 2.5 mg treatment group were found to be 99.63 +/- 6.22, 101.13 +/- 7.18 and 100.59 +/- 6.6 mm of Hg respectively, which after treatment of six weeks changed to 86.0 +/- 4.70, 87.18 +/- 5.20 and 86.27 +/- 5.68 mm of Hg. While the baseline values for average diastolic blood pressure in standing, supine and sitting positions in the Amlodipine 5 mg treatment group were found to be 98.95 +/- 5.54, 100.86 +/- 6.71 and 100.38 +/- 6.38 mm of Hg respectively, which after treatment of six weeks changed to 86.19 +/- 4.77, 87.52 +/- 5.44 and 87.33 +/- 5.98 mm of Hg. However the difference in the average reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressures, in the two treatment groups, in the sitting, supine and the standing positions was not found to be statistically significant (p > 0.1) (CI = 0.95). There was no statistically significant change in the levels of serum creatinine, SGOT, SGPT, HDL, LDL, triglyceride and total cholesterol in patients receiving Amlodipine 5 mg. The reduction in total cholesterol as well as triglyceride level in the S-Amlodipine 2.5 mg treatment group was found to be greater but it failed to show any statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: S-Amlodipine 2.5 mg is found to be equivalent in its efficacy and tolerability when compared to Amlodipine 5 mg in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.


Subject(s)
Amlodipine/administration & dosage , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Stereoisomerism , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL